China's Olympic Troubles

NEW YORK — Will the political protests andpolitical protests and deadly violence in China force
deadly violence in China force sponsors of the Beijingsponsors of the Beijing Olympics to rethink their
Olympics to rethink their strategies?strategies?
Analysts and business experts said most companiesAnalysts and business experts said most companies
wouldn’t tamp down their sponsorshipwouldn’t tamp down their sponsorship
commitments, despite pressure from activist groupscommitments, despite pressure from activist groups
and consumers.and consumers.
“Companies [are concerned about their public“Companies [are concerned about their public
image] and they have been in the past in terms ofimage] and they have been in the past in terms of
manufacturing. These companies are very attuned tomanufacturing. These companies are very attuned to
the factors that influence the decisions of Americanthe factors that influence the decisions of American
and Western European consumers,” said Robertand Western European consumers,” said Robert
Kapp, a former president of the U.S.-China BusinessKapp, a former president of the U.S.-China Business
Council. “But I would be surprised if anyCouncil. “But I would be surprised if any
sponsoring company weighed both sides and foundsponsoring company weighed both sides and found
that the downsides outweighed the upsides —that the downsides outweighed the upsides —
[especially with] the upsides including long-term[especially with] the upsides including long-term
business development in China.”business development in China.”
Adidas has said it expects its visibility as an officialAdidas has said it expects its visibility as an official
sponsor of the Beijing Games to propel it to the topsponsor of the Beijing Games to propel it to the top
spot among athletic players in China. Nike, meanwhile,spot among athletic players in China. Nike, meanwhile,
will sponsor 22 of the country’s 28 competingwill sponsor 22 of the country’s 28 competing
federations, and predicted China will be itsfederations, and predicted China will be its
second-largest market by 2009.second-largest market by 2009.
Still, the pressure is mounting from activist groups forStill, the pressure is mounting from activist groups for
sponsors to condemn China for its policies on Tibetsponsors to condemn China for its policies on Tibet
and Darfur. “We have asked several sponsors ofand Darfur. “We have asked several sponsors of
the Games to raise human rights issuesthe Games to raise human rights issues
publicly or privately with China,” said Ellenpublicly or privately with China,” said Ellen
Freudenheim, head of corporate outreach of theFreudenheim, head of corporate outreach of the
Dream for Darfur organization. There is aDream for Darfur organization. There is a
“reputation risk” for sponsors that don’t“reputation risk” for sponsors that don’t
challenge China on human rights issues, she explained.challenge China on human rights issues, she explained.
“We are not calling for a boycott. We ask them“We are not calling for a boycott. We ask them
to work with other sponsors, contact the Unitedto work with other sponsors, contact the United
Nations and the International Olympic Committee andNations and the International Olympic Committee and
make a public statement.”make a public statement.”
But that’s tricky terrain for companies.But that’s tricky terrain for companies.
“I’m sure [these issues] have caused them“I’m sure [these issues] have caused them
at least some concern, but both [Adidas and Nike]at least some concern, but both [Adidas and Nike]
seem pretty adamant about going forward,” saidseem pretty adamant about going forward,” said
John Shanley, an analyst at Susquehanna FinancialJohn Shanley, an analyst at Susquehanna Financial
Group. “They’ve invested a lot of money,Group. “They’ve invested a lot of money,
and both are very actively engaged in growing theirand both are very actively engaged in growing their
businesses in China.”businesses in China.”
Nike did not respond to requests for comment. ANike did not respond to requests for comment. A
spokesperson for Adidas confirmed the firm wasspokesperson for Adidas confirmed the firm was
concerned about the violence, but stressed theconcerned about the violence, but stressed the
importance of celebrating athletics at the Games.importance of celebrating athletics at the Games.
“Adidas and Nike are two huge companies that“Adidas and Nike are two huge companies that
manufacture in China, so there could be somemanufacture in China, so there could be some
leverage there,” said Matt Powell, an analyst atleverage there,” said Matt Powell, an analyst at
SportsOneSource. “But I think Nike’s interestSportsOneSource. “But I think Nike’s interest
is more about making sure their factories are beingis more about making sure their factories are being
run fairly, which is something they have more controlrun fairly, which is something they have more control
over.”over.”
Other experts, meanwhile, said that despite theOther experts, meanwhile, said that despite the
spotlight on China, the country isn’t likely to cavespotlight on China, the country isn’t likely to cave
to commercial pressure.to commercial pressure.
“The Chinese understand the sense of the“The Chinese understand the sense of the
Games and the need to manage problems in TibetGames and the need to manage problems in Tibet
and Darfur, and they’ll do what they can,”and Darfur, and they’ll do what they can,”
said Peter Mangione, president of Footwear Retailerssaid Peter Mangione, president of Footwear Retailers
& Distributors of America. “But they’re not& Distributors of America. “But they’re not
going to change the way they function over somegoing to change the way they function over some
shirts and shoes.”NEW YORK — Will theshirts and shoes.